360ism Magazine takes contributions from photographers, models, producers, business owners, instructors, and anyone else with a project worth documenting. Here is the standard.
The voice
The magazine sounds like someone who has actually done the work. Direct, experienced, practical, observant, occasionally skeptical.
Concretely, that means writing that is confident without exaggeration, educational without talking down, aspirational without pretending production is easy, honest about cost and effort and risk, respectful toward clients and collaborators, willing to challenge bad industry practice, curious about new tools, and focused on execution.
What does not get published
Generic motivational language. Constant use of the word passion. Claims about being revolutionary. Gear worship. Overly academic art criticism. Copy that makes every studio activity sound historic. Articles that are advertisements wearing an article’s clothes.
None of that is a style preference. Each one is a specific way that publications lose credibility with the readers who could actually hire someone.
The bar every piece has to clear
Every story must reveal a decision, a lesson, a process, or a transformation.
Four options. A piece needs at least one. “Here is a shoot I did” is none of them. “Here is why I lit it the wrong way first, and what changed when I moved one light” is a decision and a lesson.
Apply the test to your own draft before sending it. If you cannot name which of the four your piece delivers, an editor will not be able to either.
How to pitch
Answer the seven questions in The 360 Breakdown in a paragraph each and send that. It is faster than a proposal and it tells an editor everything a proposal would not.
State which pillar you think it belongs to — The 360 View, From Brief to Build, Inside 360ism, The Production Breakdown, The People Who Make It, The Business of Creating, or Visual Culture. If it does not fit any of the seven, that is worth knowing early.
Tell us what images exist. A story with no photography is a blog post. A story with contact sheets, setup frames, before-and-afters, and a final delivery is a feature.
On pictorials
Visual Culture does not accept galleries. Every pictorial submitted needs a title, a concept, a visual mood, wardrobe or styling logic, a short introduction, production credits, and a brief explanation of the creative choices.
The work is judged as a complete visual story. Ten strong unrelated frames lose to six frames that argue something.
Publish here first
The fastest route into an issue is to develop the work publicly on this site. Post the breakdown, tag it with its pillar, put the frames in the Member Gallery, take the feedback, and revise. Material that has already been read, rated, and argued with is material that has been edited before it reaches layout.
Nothing published on the network is disqualified from print. The reverse is closer to true.
Sign in or join free to leave a comment.